The Inner Ideas reveal the logical architecture beneath every argument—showing how evidence, reasons, assumptions and warrants must connect, where reasoning fallacies can fracture those connections, and what enables a conclusion to deserve rational acceptance.
Reasoning fallacies
By the end of this Unit, Mindgleians would learn to detect where fallacies fracture the connection between evidence and conclusions, enabling them to repair weak arguments through sound, evidence-grounded and self-correcting reasoning.
Straw Person Fallacy
Red Herring Fallacy
False Dilemma
Ad Hominem Fallacy
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Fallacy
False Cause Fallacy
Correlation–Causation Fallacy
Circular Reasoning
Slippery Slope
Hasty Generalisation Fallacy
Sweeping Generalisation Fallacy
Anecdotal Fallacy
Appeal to Authority Fallacy
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy
Appeal to Emotion Fallacy
Appeal to Fear Fallacy
Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy
Burden of Proof Fallacy
Moving the Goalposts
No True Scotsman Fallacy
Begging the Question
Equivocation Fallacy
Ambiguity Fallacy
Composition Fallacy
Division Fallacy
Genetic Fallacy
Tu Quoque Fallacy
Whataboutism
False Equivalence
Middle-Ground Fallacy
Nirvana Fallacy
Perfect Solution Fallacy
Single-Cause Fallacy
Oversimplification Fallacy
Non Sequitur Fallacy
Suppressed Evidence Fallacy
Loaded Question Fallacy
Hasty generalisation
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Appeal to Tradition
Appeal to Novelty
Is–Ought Fallacy
This Course is Premium
This course is not free. Unlock complete access and start learning today.
Buy This Course →